As juristswe discovered that the question of whether you and your local mechanic can access your car data to diagnose it and repair it covers issues of property rights, trade secrets, cybersecurity, privacy of data and consumer rights.
Policymakers are forced to navigate this complex legal landscape and ideally seek a balanced approach that upholds the right to repair while ensuring the security and privacy of the consumers.
Join the El Sol de México channel on WhatsApp so you don’t miss the most important information
Until recently, repair a car involved connecting to its on-board diagnostic port standard for retrieving diagnostic data. The ability of independent repair shops (not just those authorized by the manufacturer) to access this information was protected by a state law in Massachusetts, approved by voters on November 6, 2012, and by a state-level memorandum of understanding. national agreement between major automobile manufacturers and the repair industry signed on January 15, 2014.
However, with the rise of telematics systemswhich combine the computing with telecommunications, this dynamic is changing. Unlike standardized onboard diagnostic ports, telematics systems vary by automaker. These systems are usually protected by digital locks and bypassing these blocks could be considered a violation of copyright law. Telematics systems also encrypt diagnostic data before transmitting it to the manufacturer.
This reduces the accessibility to the information telematicspotentially excluding independent repair shops and jeopardizing consumer choice, a lack of choice that can generate higher costs for the consumers.
Security and privacy concerns
Critics also emphasize the concerns of privacy associated with the open access to telematics systems. Granting access to third parties could expose personal data, especially real-time location data. Advocacy groups warn that this information could be used as a tracking tool by potential abusers and others who want to exploit people.
Who owns your car data?
An issue that the legislation leaves unresolved is the ownership of vehicle data. A vehicle generates all types of data while it operates, including location, diagnostics, driving behavior, and even usage patterns of the car’s systems (for example, which applications you use and for how long).
In recent years, the issue of data ownership has gained importance. In 2015, the US Congress legislated that the data stored in event data recorders belong to the vehicle owner. This was an important step in recognizing the vehicle owner’s right to specific data sets. However, the broader question of data ownership in today’s connected cars remains unresolved.
Whether data should be subject to proprietary rights is a matter of debate. If it is considered property, it seems logical to grant these rights to the owner of the vehicle because the vehicle creates the data as it uses it. However, Through contractual terms and digital locks, manufacturers effectively ensure control of data.
Leaving aside the property issuethe crux of the issue of the right to reparation is to guarantee the vehicle owners’ access to their vehicle data.
A way forward
While concerns about legislation Massachusetts They have foundation, we believe that they should not overshadow the need to preserve a competitive space in the auto repair sector and preserve the right to repair. This is important not only to safeguard consumer autonomy and ensure competitive prices, but also to minimize environmental waste from prematurely discarded vehicles and spare parts.
The hope is that policymakers and industry can strike a balance: defend the right to repair without compromising security and privacy. One possibility is to develop tools that separate sensitive personal information from mechanical data.
➡️ Subscribe to our Newsletter and receive the most relevant notes in your email
Ultimately, a successful implementation of new laws may pave the way for a renewed national memorandum of understanding, capturing the essence of the original memorandum of understanding and preserving the right to repair automobiles In the face of the rapid advance of technologies.
* Law Professors at the University of Nevada and Ono Academic College.